Feedback on New Services Planned for My Content Service

21 May 13 8:53 am

Hi Cecille,

Yeah I think many affiliate marketers would find this option valuable, to be clear, we do not offer the services mentioned above YET, this is why I'm asking for feedback from Affilorama friends to see if they would be interested in something like this in the near future.

And to answer your question, YES! We have a pretty robust system setup (like Textbroker, WriterAccess, Etc.) and have been serving our clients with quality writing and other services since 2006.

Thanks for the feedback, anyone else? Would you find these planned services a value?

22 May 13 3:29 am

Hi Mary,

Yup that sounds like a great idea, we could do smaller packages or better yet, let the user choose exactly how many articles each month they want added to this new service, the final monthly cost would be automatically adjusted to how many articles and what cents-per-word they choose.

About article marketing, we already have SEO and Bulk ordering features built into the system, from keywords to density and LSI. As well as rewrites and spinning. We have many SEO firms and SEO people as clients. So we can do that also. Something like: everything that's mentioned above + spin + distribute the articles to top directories and networks etc. yet another idea lol.

Currently we charge $9.95/m, to get access to the system and our writers (150+ writers, we don't hire just anybody).

Our main focus with this new idea is to supplement the $9.95/m, because that's how we, the site owners, make our revenue, we don't take a big cut from our writers.

Anyway, what we want to figure out is are there enough people out there who would use this new service? A "done for you, each month" kind of service before we build it.

What would you affiliates like to see in a service?
And for how much?

Thanks.

30 May 13 3:55 am

Thanks Mary,

I agree everyone that has a website needs content. The problem is website owners want content for very cheap, 500 word articles for $2.50! Really? The other problem is that these so called "writers" (not all but most) are willing to "write" for that price AND actually do a ok job at it, meaning the quality isn't that bad, it's bad, but manageable.

Sites that harbor these willing "writers" and price points are hard to compete against on PRICE alone.

Also I always wonder why most including Mark Ling, say you need to have high quality content because of panda-penguin, SEO, conversions, etc., etc., then turn around and tell people to go to iwriter, uh ok.

That's like a professional health coach saying "you need to eat healthier, or you're going to die, so here's my favorite place to go, you should eat here from now on, check it out, it's called... McDonalds, for $2.50 you can get 2,000 calories!"

/rant