Affilorama Affiliate Guide
Affilorama Affiliate Guide
  Affilorama Home | Affiliate Program Search | Learn More | Help/Contact | Add Affiliate Program | Become An Affilorama Affiliate

XSitePro 2.0 Review

Sunday, June 8, 2008

posted by affilorama

A lot of people are fans of the new XSite Pro 2.0.

Even Splork from www.lostballinhighweeds.com sings its praises (and he doesn’t praise a lot of stuff at all, usually the opposite).

But I have to disagree with Splork on this one as I’ve found XSitePro 2.0 to be a big let down. Still I’ll give it a 7/10 because while as an upgrade from 1.0 it isn’t much better, but it’s still a good product, just didn’t live up to its hype and isn’t a great improvement over XSP 1.0.

XSite Pro is certainly a handy piece of software, don’t get me wrong. It is great for newbies (and even advanced people) who are trying to set up and design websites that make money (in particular article sites). But there are obvious problems with the software and for the last year we’ve been told that XSP 2.0 was going to be the answer to all of those.

XsitePro 2.0 Image

One of the biggest, most annoying things about XSP is that the code it spits out is not great from an SEO perspective. It is heavily focussed on a table layout which is what is easiest for XSP to implement, if you wanted to get the same look using css and divs you are still going to have to know html a bit, which is frustrating as I thought that would have been done for you in this new edition of XSP (which is supposed to be focussed on internet marketers - ie people who care about loading speeds, optimization and so forth).

Seemed like the obvious next step, but no, still the same crap that needs a coder to go in and fix up. They should at least have given us the option. Yes I’m being hyper critical here of a good piece of software, but this has been a long time in the making, it is expensive, and it isn’t really much better than the original edition from last year (why pay more? why the hooplah over 2.0?)

XSP 2 also has trouble importing XSP 1 websites and takes a lot of fiddling which is another frustration of mine, although I hear they are almost finished fixing that.

Also, it’s really annoying how xsite pro makes it so difficult to remove a left hand menu (lets say you want to keep it on some pages, but not on others (e.g. ppc landing pages)). If you remove it, it removes itself from every page, which isn’t what is wanted. Yet if you decide to ignore page layout completely (the solution that XSitePro recommends), you lose all your settings, not just your menu, but your fonts, backdrop headergraphc, the works.

I admit XSP 1 and 2 are good products, don’t get me wrong there, as they are very good for newbies to use and make it fast and easy to set up article sites. I still say that I lean on the recommending XSitePro side as it is the easiest web design software to use and is particularly good for article sites. But I see no real great advances in xsitepro 2 that are actually going to greatly increase your $$$, so if you already have XSitePro 1.0, I wouldn’t rush out and upgrade if I were you.

If you don’t have XSP at all, and you are looking to build high quality affiliate websites, then yes it is fantastic for that. Just note my pet peeves above so you are aware.

To visit the XSitePro 2.0 website, click here.


14 Comments »

Comment by Gary

June 8, 2008 @ 11:45 pm

I didn’t like the new format of X2.
Its so much different to X1. And, as you say,
I didn’t find much difference in what it is
capable of doing, so I’m sticking with using
X2 for now.

Comment by Conray Knox

June 8, 2008 @ 11:57 pm

I notice people who know how to use Dreamweaver do not like Xsitepro. Dr. Andy of ezSEO had a similar review of Xsitepro. He uses Dreamweaver.

From Mark: That’s true, although I didn’t say I don’t like XSitePro. I agree it is a very handy tool, especially for article sites, and for newbies. But considering this version 2.0 has been over a year in the making, I’m saying it is a great disappointment to me that they didn’t address many of the problems that were apparent in XSP 1.0, hence I give it a 7/10 as an overall product, but as an upgrade, don’t expect too much difference in features that you actually need.

Comment by Brad

June 9, 2008 @ 1:14 am

I wish I had something more constructive to say but Mark you about summed it up for me too. I recently gave it a spin and if you’ve been fortunate enough to be using Dreamweaver for so long then crap like this just doesn’t cut it. Off topic: Do you use Entrecards?

From Mark: No, I’ve never used Entrecards.

Comment by Roy

June 9, 2008 @ 4:59 am

Hi Mark, I rushed out upgrading to version 2.0, finding it worth the money to do so, although I agree with you on that there is still some bugs going on. However, your comment is not really true, i.e. you CAN remove the left manual bar AND keep the look and feel, but using the silo features. I have done exactly that. I think it’s a disservice of you to comment xsp2 before you actually used it yourself. Thanks Roy

From Mark: I actually have used it myself, which is why I made my comments. I spent a few hours trying to remove the left hand menu, and yes you can remove it, but you can’t remove it only on selected web pages while keeping it available for most other pages. Not without doing a massive work around which takes a about 20 minutes and is complicated (as opposed to the click of a button).

FYI, here is what XSitePro Support responded to me when I asked them about it:

Hi Mark,

Thank you for the submission
Unlike the right panel, there is not currently a want to turn off the left panel on a page by page basis. I will add it to the suggestions. We appreciate your input.

Regards,
Natalie

Ticket Details
Ticket ID: HYL-881621
Department: Support
Priority: Low
Status:
Training

Comment by Pam

June 9, 2008 @ 5:00 am

Thanks for this information on XSitePro.

As I have not bought a website builder yet I would like to know your opinion on the gold or pro version of HyperVRE. I have Ewens free website builder on my desktop but have not used it and I am not techie enough to use Frontpage or Dreamweaver. Just want to start out with the best site builder in the beginning without having to rehash as I eventually learn what works and what doesn’t.

I would really value your opinion Mark on what you would cite as the best website builder for newbies. One that optimises for SEO to the best of its capabilities.

Thanks
Pam

Comment by watzzupsport

June 9, 2008 @ 5:35 am

Thanks for the review Mark I have had the original xsite for some time and you are right some of the problems you spoke of are darn annoying. How was the other features for ease of use like the audio and visual wizards

Comment by Carl

June 9, 2008 @ 5:44 am

Hi Mark,
Thanks for the review as I have a free upgrade available due to only having purchased XSP1 reciently. I will not be upgrading untill I hav finished my website and only then will i look at the upgrade.
P.S. I love yuor opening paragraph lol. Cheers Mark

Regards,
Carl

Comment by Joe Stewart

June 9, 2008 @ 7:50 am

I agree Mark. If it weren’t for the directory “siloing” feature in version 2, I probably wouldn’t have upgraded at all, knowing what I know now.

Another thing I noticed is that when I imported my sites from V1 all of my navigation links were squished together with no space between them. It was just one big line of words and letters that I had to go through and modify before I could publish again. I haven’t even gone through all of my sites yet. I’m almost afraid to.

Honestly, I love XsitePro version 1. I’ve built all of my sites with it and it was really a life saver when it came out in 2005, but if I had to do it all over again I think I’d go a different direction.

Just my two cents.

Joe

Comment by Idalino

June 9, 2008 @ 8:27 am

Hello,

I agree with you, man… I upgraded to V2 basically because of the new templates. Everything else still pretty much the same, some a little better and some even worse.

You are right, tables for everything, really sucks :^(.

I agree that it is very easy to use and very fast to start a site and publish it, but then you are stuck in many ways.

The sites V2 creates (with included templates) are very heavy, even for my broadband connection.

In my opinion, NetObjects is years ahead, a little longer of a learning curve but I think it is worth it…

Nothing in XsitePro V2 justifies the $297… for me was only $97.

To ask $297 you need to be at a higher and more current level.

This site was created with XsitePro V2: http://www.iusedtorunoutofjuice.com

Comment by Jan

June 9, 2008 @ 7:14 pm

Glad to read your honest opinion. I’ll stick with DreamWeaver.

thx,
Jan

Comment by Dan

June 9, 2008 @ 8:58 pm

I upgraded right away also. The program definitely got a make-over but I agree with Mark that certain core changes would have been more beneficial. The design is really strong for article sites but it takes some tricks to make it work well with direct marketing sites. One thing that is easier in v2 is incorporating externally made pages. I just used another program to make my squeeze page and then imported it. That works fairly well. The left menu problem is the most glaring. I hope that if enough of us request a change there they will listen.

Comment by Jono

June 10, 2008 @ 1:57 am

I agree with you Mark. Some things are really good about XSP2. But there are some things that are so irritating that I want to throw my laptop out the window. The MS-word like designer part of the software is full of bugs, and I am forever fiddling with headings and fonts to get the desired result. It’s just incredibly frustrating when it can do big flash complicated things, but it can’t do some of the simplest things.

Comment by Marc Lindsay

June 10, 2008 @ 4:48 pm

Hey Mark,

Rather unusual review from you there. You must have been waiting on the css upgrades as such and had hopes on it being in this version.

It looks as though perhaps they have gone for hype rather than function in an attempt to re-invigorate their software.

It seems to me that css would have been an obvious option to move over too. It certainly makes changing site layouts soooo much easier.

Marc Lindsay

Comment by Mitch Powell

August 28, 2008 @ 10:44 pm

I’m so glad I read this review. I was looking into buying it, but now I can see I would be greatly disappointed by its table-based layouts. I am always disappointed when I get my hands on free templates, only to find they’re completely table-based.

You would think, by now, sophisticated software designers would have adopted the CSS implementation.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

PREVIOUS POST: Paint.net for image resizing      NEXT POST: 6 Secrets to High Converting Bullet Points