<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Has Google Adwords been wrecking havoc with you?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.affilorama.com/blog/6/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.affilorama.com/blog/6/</link>
	<description>Affilorama helps you in making money online with affiliate programs and make money fast online. You can make money at home online through our affiliate programs</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 14:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Internet Marketing Fool &#187; How To Be The Superest Affiliate</title>
		<link>http://www.affilorama.com/blog/6/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>Internet Marketing Fool &#187; How To Be The Superest Affiliate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 21:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.affilorama.com/blog/?p=6#comment-69</guid>
		<description>[...] Rosalind doesn&#8217;t name the super affiliate, but leaves enough clues to find a very likely candidate. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Rosalind doesn&#8217;t name the super affiliate, but leaves enough clues to find a very likely candidate. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: affilorama</title>
		<link>http://www.affilorama.com/blog/6/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>affilorama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 14:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.affilorama.com/blog/?p=6#comment-35</guid>
		<description>Susan, I didn't say that it definately had anything to do with the new Adwords algorithm. I was hypothesising that it might play a part. 

I will respond in full in my blog titled "Boy did I get it wrong!"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Susan, I didn&#8217;t say that it definately had anything to do with the new Adwords algorithm. I was hypothesising that it might play a part. </p>
<p>I will respond in full in my blog titled &#8220;Boy did I get it wrong!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suzzie</title>
		<link>http://www.affilorama.com/blog/6/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Suzzie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 18:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.affilorama.com/blog/?p=6#comment-33</guid>
		<description>Sorry Mark,

You're absolutely incorrect when you say that PR has anything to do with the new Adwords algorighm for ranking sites based on relevancy.  You haven't heard this from a Google rep because it's not true.  I've asked specifically and been told that PR doesn't play any role in the new algorighm.  If this were the case, how could a new site on a new domain ever get listed in the paid listings?  Think about what you're posting on this blog before you post it.

Susan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Mark,</p>
<p>You&#8217;re absolutely incorrect when you say that PR has anything to do with the new Adwords algorighm for ranking sites based on relevancy.  You haven&#8217;t heard this from a Google rep because it&#8217;s not true.  I&#8217;ve asked specifically and been told that PR doesn&#8217;t play any role in the new algorighm.  If this were the case, how could a new site on a new domain ever get listed in the paid listings?  Think about what you&#8217;re posting on this blog before you post it.</p>
<p>Susan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tony</title>
		<link>http://www.affilorama.com/blog/6/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 02:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.affilorama.com/blog/?p=6#comment-30</guid>
		<description>site not uploaded yet, it's strictly an affiliate site with around 10 products or so.  I was gonna use google as a source of advertising.  Now it sounds as though I shouldn't.  Is there a site or service that tells you the highest affiliate percentage and the ratio as far as how many people come and buy on the sites?  I know I rambled here but I'm new...help!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>site not uploaded yet, it&#8217;s strictly an affiliate site with around 10 products or so.  I was gonna use google as a source of advertising.  Now it sounds as though I shouldn&#8217;t.  Is there a site or service that tells you the highest affiliate percentage and the ratio as far as how many people come and buy on the sites?  I know I rambled here but I&#8217;m new&#8230;help!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John T</title>
		<link>http://www.affilorama.com/blog/6/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>John T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 13:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.affilorama.com/blog/?p=6#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Well one good thing to come out of this is there is much less competition in adwords for sites with a quality landing page.  

Now the question is, can their bots really recognize a quality landing page? I'm still seeing landing pages come up with no page rank and the keyword is no where on the page yet they have the high positoins in adwords.  I seriously doubt they are paying $10 per click.

John T</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well one good thing to come out of this is there is much less competition in adwords for sites with a quality landing page.  </p>
<p>Now the question is, can their bots really recognize a quality landing page? I&#8217;m still seeing landing pages come up with no page rank and the keyword is no where on the page yet they have the high positoins in adwords.  I seriously doubt they are paying $10 per click.</p>
<p>John T</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lowell</title>
		<link>http://www.affilorama.com/blog/6/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Lowell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 12:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.affilorama.com/blog/?p=6#comment-24</guid>
		<description>If Google wants to make such rules, they have every right. We also have every right not to be their customer. That is the route I have taken. 

This bid blackmail happened to me several months ago, I got the same sort of unhelpful answers as Mark. I moved to Overture. Google may say they have other motives, but if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it's a duck.

Google doesn't run the internet. Google's policies keep a lot of very worthwhile new websites out of their search results. Many of Google's so called relevant search results turn up pages that haven't been updated in years. Among other things, Google is rewarding staleness. 

The natural result of such tyranny is the growth of tagging sites where real people get to vote on worthwhile web pages, whether they were put up years ago, or yesterday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Google wants to make such rules, they have every right. We also have every right not to be their customer. That is the route I have taken. </p>
<p>This bid blackmail happened to me several months ago, I got the same sort of unhelpful answers as Mark. I moved to Overture. Google may say they have other motives, but if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it&#8217;s a duck.</p>
<p>Google doesn&#8217;t run the internet. Google&#8217;s policies keep a lot of very worthwhile new websites out of their search results. Many of Google&#8217;s so called relevant search results turn up pages that haven&#8217;t been updated in years. Among other things, Google is rewarding staleness. </p>
<p>The natural result of such tyranny is the growth of tagging sites where real people get to vote on worthwhile web pages, whether they were put up years ago, or yesterday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: simon</title>
		<link>http://www.affilorama.com/blog/6/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 11:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.affilorama.com/blog/?p=6#comment-23</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Mark. I am still to invest in your affiliate training. I have been involved in affiliate marketing, but without a website of my own, so just using adwords along with the clickbank market place. However, I've spent almost &#163;900 and seen a return of $38 which I can't even access because it falls under the minimum payout from clickbank! I must be doing something very wrong... I get loads of recorded clicks but no sales? I had also 'spread' my marketing across 6 entirely different products.. from business to pets! Made no difference! Will your course rectify this and will it help me to turn the losses around fairly quickly? Simon&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Hi Simon,&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Wow that's a lot of money to spend without much return! If you follow my course properly and participate on the members forum (ie post your questions so that I can see your progress and help guide&#160;you along the way), then yes there is no reason why you shouldn't turn things around dramatically.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Mark Ling&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mark. I am still to invest in your affiliate training. I have been involved in affiliate marketing, but without a website of my own, so just using adwords along with the clickbank market place. However, I&#8217;ve spent almost &pound;900 and seen a return of $38 which I can&#8217;t even access because it falls under the minimum payout from clickbank! I must be doing something very wrong&#8230; I get loads of recorded clicks but no sales? I had also &#8217;spread&#8217; my marketing across 6 entirely different products.. from business to pets! Made no difference! Will your course rectify this and will it help me to turn the losses around fairly quickly? Simon</p>
<p><strong><em>Hi Simon,</em></strong></p>
<p><strong><em>Wow that&#8217;s a lot of money to spend without much return! If you follow my course properly and participate on the members forum (ie post your questions so that I can see your progress and help guide&nbsp;you along the way), then yes there is no reason why you shouldn&#8217;t turn things around dramatically.</em></strong></p>
<p><strong><em>Mark Ling</em></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JT</title>
		<link>http://www.affilorama.com/blog/6/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>JT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 00:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.affilorama.com/blog/?p=6#comment-22</guid>
		<description>There might also be another way to bring Google to their knees, That is just don't advertise with them. That has alway's been very effective in other businesses!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There might also be another way to bring Google to their knees, That is just don&#8217;t advertise with them. That has alway&#8217;s been very effective in other businesses!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terrena</title>
		<link>http://www.affilorama.com/blog/6/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Terrena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 21:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.affilorama.com/blog/?p=6#comment-21</guid>
		<description>Gosh just more work to get ahead.  Nice of you to explain this one though.  And a question,

Have you ever done an article on;
&#62;On January 12, 2005 Google introduced a new rule whereby &#62;they only show one ad per affiliate and parent company &#62;sharing the same domain per search query. 

&#62;What this effectively means is that you need to link to a &#62;landing page rather than use a direct affiliate link.


Keep up the good work!

Terrena 

USA

www.vickiesremedies.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gosh just more work to get ahead.  Nice of you to explain this one though.  And a question,</p>
<p>Have you ever done an article on;<br />
&gt;On January 12, 2005 Google introduced a new rule whereby &gt;they only show one ad per affiliate and parent company &gt;sharing the same domain per search query. </p>
<p>&gt;What this effectively means is that you need to link to a &gt;landing page rather than use a direct affiliate link.</p>
<p>Keep up the good work!</p>
<p>Terrena </p>
<p>USA</p>
<p><a href="http://www.vickiesremedies.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.vickiesremedies.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.affilorama.com/blog/6/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 20:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.affilorama.com/blog/?p=6#comment-20</guid>
		<description>I wasted a ton of money tring to promote an affiliate web site, I had to bid high to get a good page rank, but I thought the site had a quality product to offer but I guess I was wrong. I had a pretty good clickthrough rate, but that did not really help me since I only got like one conversion, I am only going to advertise through their content network now, the prices are just too high to use good keywrods.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wasted a ton of money tring to promote an affiliate web site, I had to bid high to get a good page rank, but I thought the site had a quality product to offer but I guess I was wrong. I had a pretty good clickthrough rate, but that did not really help me since I only got like one conversion, I am only going to advertise through their content network now, the prices are just too high to use good keywrods.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
